Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 32
Filter
7.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 67(1): 74-80, 2019 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30306541

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To examine the association between central nervous system (CNS) medication dosage burden and risk of serious falls, including hip fractures, in individuals with a history of a recent fall. DESIGN: Nested case-control study. SETTING: Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Community Living Centers (CLCs). PARTICIPANTS: CLC residents aged 65 and older with a history of a fall or hip fracture in the year before a CLC admission between July 1, 2005, and June 30, 2009. Each case (n = 316) was matched to four controls (n = 1264) on age, sex, and length of stay. MEASUREMENTS: Outcomes were serious falls identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ACD-9) or Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) E codes, diagnosis codes, or procedure codes associated with a VHA emergency department visit or hospitalization during the CLC stay. Bar code medication administration data were used to calculate CNS standardized daily doses (SDDs) for opioid and benzodiazepine receptor agonists, some antidepressants, antiepileptics, and antipsychotics received in the 6 days before the outcome date by dividing residents' actual CNS daily doses by the minimum effective geriatric daily doses and adding the results. Multivariable conditional logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association between total CNS medication dosage burden, categorized as 0, 1 to 2, and 3 or more SDDs, and the outcome of recurrent serious falls. RESULTS: More cases (44.3%) than controls (35.8%) received 3.0 or more CNS SDDs (p = .02). Risk of serious falls was greater in residents with 3.0 or more SDDs than in those with 0 (adjusted odds ratio (aOR)=1.49, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.03-2.14). Those with 1.0 to 2.9 SDDs had a risk similar to that of those with 0 SDDs (aOR=1.03, 95%CI=0.72-1.48). CONCLUSION: Nursing home residents with a history of a fall or hip fracture receiving 3.0 or more CNS SDDs were more likely to have a recurrent serious fall than those taking no CNS medications. Interventions targeting this vulnerable population may help reduce serious falls. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:74-80, 2019.


Subject(s)
Accidental Falls/statistics & numerical data , Central Nervous System Agents/adverse effects , Hip Fractures/epidemiology , Nursing Homes/statistics & numerical data , Veterans/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Case-Control Studies , Female , Hip Fractures/chemically induced , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Odds Ratio , United States/epidemiology , United States Department of Veterans Affairs
9.
Health Serv Res ; 53(1): 214-235, 2018 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28004385

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To identify space-time clusters of changes in prescribing aripiprazole for bipolar disorder among providers in the VA. DATA SOURCES: VA administrative data from 2002 to 2010 were used to identify prescriptions of aripiprazole for bipolar disorder. Prescriber characteristics were obtained using the Personnel and Accounting Integrated Database. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective space-time cluster analysis using the space-time permutation statistic. DATA EXTRACTION METHODS: All VA service users with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder were included in the patient population. Individuals with any schizophrenia spectrum diagnoses were excluded. We also identified all clinicians who wrote a prescription for any bipolar disorder medication. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The study population included 32,630 prescribers. Of these, 8,643 wrote qualifying prescriptions. We identified three clusters of aripiprazole prescribing centered in Massachusetts, Ohio, and the Pacific Northwest. Clusters were associated with prescribing by VA-employed (vs. contracted) prescribers. Nurses with prescribing privileges were more likely to make a prescription for aripiprazole in cluster locations compared with psychiatrists. Primary care physicians were less likely. CONCLUSIONS: Early prescribing of aripiprazole for bipolar disorder clustered geographically and was associated with prescriber subgroups. These methods support prospective surveillance of practice changes and identification of associated health system characteristics.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Aripiprazole/therapeutic use , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Residence Characteristics/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Antipsychotic Agents/administration & dosage , Aripiprazole/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nurses/statistics & numerical data , Physicians, Primary Care/statistics & numerical data , Psychiatry/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Space-Time Clustering , United States , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Veterans
10.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 66(2): 282-288, 2018 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29265170

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To examine the effect of interventions to optimize medication use on adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in older adults. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. EMBASE, PubMed, OVID, Cochrane Library, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Google Scholar were searched through April 30, 2017. SETTING: Randomized controlled trials. PARTICIPANTS: Older adults (mean age ≥65) taking medications. MEASUREMENTS: Two authors independently extracted relevant information and assessed studies for risk of bias. Discrepancies were resolved in consensus meetings. The outcomes were any and serious ADRs. Random-effects models were used to combine the results of multiple studies and create summary estimates. RESULTS: Thirteen randomized controlled trials involving 6,198 older adults were included. The studies employed a number of different interventions that were categorized as pharmacist-led interventions (8 studies), other health professional-led interventions (3 studies), a brief educational session (1 study), and a technology intervention (1 study). The intervention group was 21% less likely than the control group to experience any ADR (odds ratio (OR) = 0.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.62-0.99). In the six studies that examined serious ADRs, the intervention group was 36% less likely than the control group to experience a serious ADR (OR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.42-0.98). CONCLUSION: Interventions designed to optimize medication use reduced the risk of any and serious ADRs in older adults. Implementation of these successful interventions in healthcare systems may improve medication safety in older adults.


Subject(s)
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/therapy , Pharmacists , Aged , Humans , Medical Informatics/methods , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
11.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 65(8): 1789-1795, 2017 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28369688

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether elderly veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and dementia are more likely to be prescribed second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) than those with PTSD alone. DESIGN: National serial cross-sectional study. SETTING: Veterans Health Affairs inpatient and outpatient settings. PARTICIPANTS: Veterans aged 65 and older with PTSD (excluding schizophrenia or bipolar disorder) with or without concomitant dementia who received care from the Veterans Health Administration between 2003 and 2010 were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, codes (N = 93,068; 11.1% with dementia). MEASUREMENTS: Trends in SGA prescribing and odds of being prescribed an SGA were determined using a multivariable logistic regression model adjusted for clinical, sociodemographic, and geographic covariates. RESULTS: Between 2004 and 2009, SGA prescribing declined annually from 7.0% to 5.1% of elderly veterans with PTSD without dementia and 13.2% to 8.9% in those with dementia; findings over time consistently indicated that veterans with PTSD and dementia had at least twice the odds of being prescribed an SGA as those without PTSD (odds ratios 2.03 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.82-2.26) to 2.33 (95% CI = 2.10-2.58). CONCLUSION: Although the prescribing of SGAs to elderly veterans with PTSD has decreased, prescribing an SGA to those with dementia remained consistently higher than for those with PTSD alone and is problematic given the high prevalence of medical comorbidities in this aging population coupled with the lack of compelling evidence for effectiveness of SGAs in individuals with dementia.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Dementia/drug therapy , Off-Label Use , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/drug therapy , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends , United States , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Veterans
12.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 65(7): 1401-1405, 2017 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28369729

ABSTRACT

Medications can pose considerable risk in older adults. This article annotates four articles addressing this concern from 2016. The first provides national data on the use of specific prescription, over-the-counter and dietary supplements in older adults and their change over time. The second discusses the opportunity of deprescribing ineffective/unnecessary stool softeners (i.e., docusate) routinely given to older hospital patients. The third national study examines common adverse drug events in older emergency room patients. Finally, a study published demonstrating a potential association between melatonin and fractures is discussed. This manuscript is intended to provide a narrative review of key publications in medication safety for clinicians and researchers committed to improving medication safety in older adults.


Subject(s)
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/prevention & control , Inappropriate Prescribing/prevention & control , Nonprescription Drugs/adverse effects , Polypharmacy , Aged , Dietary Supplements/adverse effects , Humans , Medication Reconciliation , Risk Assessment
13.
J Gen Intern Med ; 32(Suppl 1): 70-73, 2017 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28271432

ABSTRACT

Weight management medications (WMM) are underutilized as an adjunct to behavioral and lifestyle interventions. In fiscal years 2014-2015, a total of approximately 2500 veterans-a mere 2% of veterans receiving care from the Veterans Health Administration (VHA)-eligible for a WMM received a prescription for one. A State of the Art Conference on Weight Management workgroup, focused on pharmacotherapy, developed evidence-based recommendations and strategies to foster the appropriate use of WMM in the VHA. The workgroup identified patient, prescriber, and health system barriers to and facilitators for prescribing WMM. Barriers included patient and provider concerns about medication safety and efficacy, limited involvement of primary care, restrictive medication criteria for use (CFU), and skepticism among providers regarding the safety and efficacy of WMM and the perception of obesity as a disease. Potential facilitators for removing barriers included patient and provider education about WMM and the health benefits of weight loss, increased engagement of primary care providers in weight management, relaxation of the CFU, and creation of a system to help patients navigate through weight management treatment options. Several research questions were framed with regard to WMM in general, and specifically to the care of obese veterans. While some of the workgroup's conclusions reflect issues specific to the VHA, many are likely to be applicable to other health organizations.


Subject(s)
Anti-Obesity Agents/therapeutic use , Obesity Management/methods , Obesity/drug therapy , Congresses as Topic , Drug Utilization , Humans , United States , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Veterans Health
14.
Psychiatr Serv ; 67(11): 1189-1196, 2016 11 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27301765

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Twenty to thirty percent of patients with schizophrenia experience treatment resistance. Clozapine is the only medication proven effective for treatment-resistant schizophrenia. However, in most settings less than 25% of patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia receive clozapine. This study was conducted to identify facilitators of and barriers to clozapine use to inform development of interventions to maximize appropriate clozapine utilization. METHODS: Seventy semistructured phone interviews were conducted with key informants of clozapine processes at U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs medical centers in various U.S. regions, including urban and rural areas, with high (N=5) and low (N=5) rates of clozapine utilization. Interviewees included members of mental health leadership, psychiatrists, clinical pharmacists, and advanced practice nurses. Interviews were analyzed by using an emergent thematic strategy to identify barriers and facilitators related to clozapine prescribing. RESULTS: High utilization was associated with integration of nonphysician psychiatric providers and clear organizational processes and infrastructure for treatment of severe mental illness, for example, use of clozapine clinics and mental health intensive case management. Low utilization was associated with a lack of champions to support clozapine processes and with limited-capacity care systems. Obstacles identified at both high- and low-utilization sites included complex, time-consuming paperwork; reliance on a few individuals to facilitate processes; and issues related to transportation for patients living far from care facilities. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation efforts to organize, streamline, and simplify clozapine processes; development of a multidisciplinary clozapine clinic; increased capacity of existing clinics; and provision of transportation are reasonable targets to increase clozapine utilization.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care Facilities/statistics & numerical data , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Clozapine/therapeutic use , Hospitals, Veterans/statistics & numerical data , Nurse Practitioners/statistics & numerical data , Pharmacists/statistics & numerical data , Psychiatry/statistics & numerical data , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/statistics & numerical data , Humans , United States
15.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 64(4): 921-2, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27100609
16.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 64(2): 401-8, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26804210

ABSTRACT

Medication errors and adverse drug events are common in older adults, but locating literature addressing these issues is often challenging. The objective of this article is to summarize recent studies addressing medication errors and adverse drug events in a single location to improve accessibility for individuals working with older adults. A comprehensive literature search for studies published in 2014 was conducted, and 51 potential articles were identified. After critical review, 17 studies were selected for inclusion based on innovation; rigorous observational or experimental study designs; and use of reliable, valid measures. Four articles characterizing potentially inappropriate prescribing and interventions to optimize medication regimens were annotated and critiqued in detail. The authors hope that health policy-makers and clinicians find this information helpful in improving the quality of care for older adults.


Subject(s)
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Medication Errors/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Geriatric Assessment , Humans , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Risk Factors
17.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 63(12): e8-e18, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26447889

ABSTRACT

The National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) and the Pharmacy Quality Alliance (PQA) use the American Geriatrics Society (AGS) Beers Criteria to designate the quality measure Use of High-Risk Medications in the Elderly (HRM). The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) use the HRM measure to monitor and evaluate the quality of care provided to Medicare beneficiaries. NCQA additionally uses the AGS Beers Criteria to designate the quality measure Potentially Harmful Drug-Disease Interactions in the Elderly. Medications included in these measures may be harmful to elderly adults and negatively affect a healthcare plan's quality ratings. Prescribers, pharmacists, patients, and healthcare plans may benefit from evidence-based alternative medication treatments to avoid these problems. Therefore the goal of this work was to develop a list of alternative medications to those included in the two measures. The authors conducted a comprehensive literature review from 2000 to 2015 and a search of their personal files. From the evidence, they prepared a list of drug-therapy alternatives with supporting references. A reference list of nonpharmacological approaches was also provided when appropriate. NCQA, PQA, the 2015 AGS Beers Criteria panel, and the Executive Committee of the AGS reviewed the drug therapy alternatives and nonpharmacological approaches. Recommendations by these groups were incorporated into the final list of alternatives. The final product of drug-therapy alternatives to medications included in the two quality measures and some nonpharmacological resources will be useful to health professionals, consumers, payers, and health systems that care for older adults.

20.
Pain Med ; 16(5): 886-97, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25846648

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To present the first in a series of articles designed to deconstruct chronic low back pain (CLBP) in older adults. The series presents CLBP as a syndrome, a final common pathway for the expression of multiple contributors rather than a disease localized exclusively to the lumbosacral spine. Each article addresses one of twelve important contributors to pain and disability in older adults with CLBP. This article focuses on hip osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: The evaluation and treatment algorithm, a table articulating the rationale for the individual algorithm components, and stepped-care drug recommendations were developed using a modified Delphi approach. The Principal Investigator, a five-member content expert panel and a nine-member primary care panel were involved in the iterative development of these materials. The algorithm was developed keeping in mind medications and other resources available within Veterans Health Administration (VHA) facilities. As panelists were not exclusive to the VHA, the materials can be applied in both VHA and civilian settings. The illustrative clinical case was taken from one of the contributor's clinical practice. RESULTS: We present an algorithm and supportive materials to help guide the care of older adults with hip OA, an important contributor to CLBP. The case illustrates an example of complex hip-spine syndrome, in which hip OA was an important contributor to disability in an older adult with CLBP. CONCLUSIONS: Hip OA is common and should be evaluated routinely in the older adult with CLBP so that appropriately targeted treatment can be designed.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Low Back Pain/therapy , Osteoarthritis, Hip/diagnosis , Osteoarthritis, Hip/therapy , Aged, 80 and over , Chronic Pain , Humans , Low Back Pain/etiology , Male , Osteoarthritis, Hip/complications
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...